Maxwell's Equations and the Unification of Electromagnetism
How four equations bound electricity, magnetism, and light into a single phenomenon — and gave physics its first great unification.
For most of the nineteenth century, electricity and magnetism were treated as cousins, not twins. Charges attracted and repelled. Magnets had their own poles and their own peculiar habits. Both had been measured, catalogued, and roughly tamed, but no one could quite say what the relationship between them was. By 1865, James Clerk Maxwell had written down four equations that did something more ambitious than describe either phenomenon. They erased the distinction. Electricity and magnetism were one thing — the electromagnetic field — and, as a side consequence, so was light.
It was the first time physics had pulled off a true unification. Everything since — the electroweak force, attempts at grand unification, the dream of a theory of everything — takes its cue from what Maxwell did.
Two strangers and a hint
Before Maxwell, the picture went roughly like this. Coulomb had quantified the force between static charges. Ampère had shown that currents in parallel wires attract or repel like little magnets. Oersted, almost by accident in 1820, had noticed that a compass needle twitched when a current was switched on nearby — the first whisper that the two phenomena were not strangers after all.
Then came Michael Faraday. Self-taught, allergic to the calculus the Continental physicists relied on, Faraday thought in pictures. He imagined space around a magnet or a charge as being threaded with invisible lines of force, packed thick where the field was strong, splayed apart where it was weak. In 1831 he discovered induction: a magnet pushed through a coil of wire produced a current, but only while it was moving. A changing magnetic field made an electric one.
Faraday had the physics. He did not have the mathematics. That is what Maxwell brought.
Four equations
Maxwell did something subtle. He took Faraday's pictures literally and translated them, line by line, into the language of vector calculus. What came out, after years of polishing and a famous shift from twenty equations down to four, was a compact bookkeeping of how fields behave.
In modern dress they say:
The four laws, pictured. Two say where the field lines come from; two say how the fields stir each other up.
The first two are static. Gauss's law says electric field lines start on positive charges and end on negative ones — charges are the sources. The companion law for magnetism says, flatly, that there are no magnetic charges. Cut a bar magnet in half and you get two smaller bar magnets, not a north pole and a south pole. Magnetic field lines close on themselves.
The other two are dynamic, and they are the interesting ones. Faraday's law — the one extracted from his coil experiments — says that a changing magnetic field induces a circulating electric field. Ampère's law, in the form Maxwell completed, says the reverse: a current, or a changing electric field, induces a circulating magnetic field.
The missing piece
That phrase — or a changing electric field — is Maxwell's most consequential contribution, and it is not obvious. Ampère had said currents make magnetic fields, full stop. Maxwell noticed that this was internally inconsistent. Charge had to be conserved, and Ampère's law as written contradicted that in the gap of a charging capacitor, where no current flows between the plates yet the magnetic field is plainly there.
The fix was a small term, the displacement current: a changing electric field acts, for the purposes of producing magnetism, exactly like a real current. It is the symmetric partner of Faraday's induction. Add it, and the four equations close into a tight loop. A changing E‑field makes a B‑field. A changing B‑field makes an E‑field. Each can feed the other.
A changing electric field stirs up a magnetic field. A changing magnetic field stirs up an electric field. Once started, the disturbance no longer needs charges. It needs only itself.
Light, falling out
Maxwell did the obvious thing: he combined his four equations and looked for what they predicted in empty space, far from any charge or current. What came out was a wave equation. Not approximately a wave equation. Exactly a wave equation, of the same mathematical form as the one for sound in air or ripples on a string.
And the wave had a speed. It was given by two constants Maxwell already knew from laboratory measurements of static electricity and static magnetism — the permittivity and permeability of free space. Plug them in, and the number that came out was approximately 3×108 metres per second.
Which was the speed of light. Measured, separately, by Fizeau and others, in entirely unrelated experiments with rotating cogs and mirrors.
An electromagnetic wave. E and B oscillate perpendicular to each other and to the direction of travel, each one perpetually generating the other.
The conclusion was unavoidable, and Maxwell wrote it down with characteristic restraint: light itself… is an electromagnetic disturbance in the form of waves propagated through the electromagnetic field according to electromagnetic laws. Three sciences — electricity, magnetism, and optics — collapsed into one. Radio waves, microwaves, X‑rays, gamma rays: all the same stuff, at different frequencies. The visible spectrum is a thin band on a long ribbon.
What unification means
It is worth saying what was, and was not, achieved. Maxwell did not show that electric and magnetic fields are identical — they obviously aren't. He showed they are two faces of a single object. Move past a stationary charge and the purely electric field it produces appears, in your frame, partly as a magnetic one. The split between E and B depends on who is looking. The electromagnetic field itself is what is real. Einstein took exactly this hint, forty years later, and turned it into special relativity.
Unification, in physics, means this kind of move. Two phenomena that looked separate are revealed as different projections of a deeper structure. The electroweak unification did it for electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. Newton, before Maxwell, had done a smaller version of it — the apple and the moon, both falling, governed by one law. But Maxwell's was the template. Four equations, one field, an unexpected guest dropping out of the algebra: light.
You can write the whole of classical electromagnetism on a postcard. Generations of physicists have noted, with something between awe and embarrassment, that the universe should have been so cooperative.
Further reading
- Maxwell, J. C. (1865). A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.
- Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism.
- Faraday, M. (1831–1855). Experimental Researches in Electricity.
- Feynman, R. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II, chapters 1, 18.
- Forbes, N. & Mahon, B. (2014). Faraday, Maxwell, and the Electromagnetic Field.